GRE作文萬能例子總結
GRE作文萬能例子總結!我們在備考GRE寫作的時候，需要儲備一些萬能的例子，方便我們在寫作的過程中使用。那麼具體的備考過程中，大家應該儲備哪些萬能例子呢?下面小編爲大家做了整理，供大家參考。
GRE作文萬能例子總結
1、 表象與本質、目的與方法、批評與讚揚、批判與繼承
表象的對立往往意味着本質的相同。
Superficial confrontation indicates the similarity of essence.
2、教育類
1. For instance, applicants with Computer Science degrees would not only be qualified for jobs in high-tech companies, they would also be well prepared for any job with computer skills as a prerequisite.
2. A good education is supposed to include everything from languages to mathematics to science, etc.
3. A well-rounded education leads to well-balanced people, which in turn leads to a tolerant, knowledgeable society.
4. There are a great many children thinking the main purpose of education should be to afford them pleasure and enjoyment. (注意there be句型後的名詞再加動詞不能用原形!)
3、科技與人文;創新與傳統
科技貌似推動人類向前，可前方是一片彷徨;人文讓我們照見過往，給了我們存在希望。
Technology seemingly pushes humans forward, yet forward to the unknown; humanities mirror humans into the past, the past of existence and hope.
4、成功與事業
1. Jackie Chan once told that when he was still a teenager, he and his partners were required to practice more than 12 hours a day; and it was said Jet Li was sent to be an apprentice when he was hardly four years old.
2. Bill Gates, as we know, dropping out from university when he found the possibility of earning money in a new massive market - personal computer market. As a result, he succeeded
3. Steven Jobs found Apple company when he was young, and when his business reached the peak, he was fired by directors of board. However he never lost hope and didn't give up. Jobs set up a new company named Pixar and made several famous animation movies. Finally when Pixar was bought by Apple, Jobs returned to Apple.
5、時間性題目
傳統與創新、歷史是否可以被借鑑、科技與人文、進步
時間對於個體來說是線性而不可逆轉的;而對於整個宇宙，無非是一個周而復始的圓圈。
Time for individuals is consecutive and irreversible, but for the universe, just a repetitive circle.
6、政府與人民
人民除了權利，什麼都沒有，甚至沒有使用權利的基本能力。因而他們選舉了一個叫做政府的機構。
Citizens, apart from claiming to have rights, in fact, have no capability to exercise their rights. Therefore, they select a government.
7、個體與集體、身份、領導者與大衆
他人給了你身份，故而，他們就是你的地獄。
Others bestow you an identity, and thus, they are the hell.
8、政治與道德
政治是權力的鬥爭和利益的平衡。民主只是用制度制約人性的本惡。
Nothing is politics but the struggle of power and the balance of interests.
9、教育、傳統與創新、批判思考
教育用束縛的方式，啓迪了人們如何通過繼承而達到顛覆的目的。
Education, by means of confinement, enlightens people to inherit and then to overthrow the past.
GRE作文提綱怎麼寫
1、gre寫作什麼時候開始練習在模考時加入提綱?
答：覺得比較適合的是在最後10天到一週的樣子。因爲這首先需要在一定高強度的寫作練習之後，再者，需要對題目已經有了一定的把握。很多的提綱在之前都大體列過時。然後在限時中加入提綱的寫作。
2、gre寫作用多長時間列提綱?
答：我的經驗是ISSUE總體比ARGU短。ISSUE大體要2-3分鐘，ARGU怎麼都要3分鐘。可能要5分鐘。
3、gre作文提綱裏都要包含些什麼?
答：ISSUE來說，讀第一遍題目時把關鍵詞提出來，接着將核心話題列出來，根據這個話題開始一條一條列出你要寫的東西;ARGU來說，因爲題目比較長，所以讀題的時間就要比前者長。第一遍建議先把每一個意羣講的是什麼簡要提出來，排上序號;第二從這些小短句分析其文章結構和主要錯誤;第三把自己對錯誤的闡述順序列出來。這樣差不多是可以的了。
4、gre作文列提綱的一些技巧
答：需要在練習中找到自己的記錄法，哪種縮寫是自己看得明瞭的。不要記出來的摘要最後自己還要辨析幾分鐘，建議在平時列提綱的時候就有意識的做一下限定時間練習，看2-3分鐘能不能把大體的框架列出來。
GRE寫作提綱的技巧：
一：明白什麼時候開始練習在模考時加入新GRE作文提綱
對於考生來說比較適合的時間是在最後10天到一週的樣子。因爲這首先需要在一定高強度的寫作練習之後，再者，需要對題目已經有了一定的把握。很多的提綱在之前都大體列過。然後在限時中加入提綱的寫作。
二：瞭解需要多長時間才能列好GRE作文提綱推薦閱讀：gre論壇 gmat論壇 託福寫作機經 gre報名流程
我的經驗是ISSUE總體比ARGU短。GRE ISSUE作文大體要2-3分鐘，ARGU怎麼都要3分鐘。可能要5分鐘。
三：弄清GRE作文提綱裏都要包含些什麼
對ISSUE來說，讀第一遍題目時把關鍵詞提出來，接着將核心話題列出來，根據這個話題開始一條一條列出你要寫的東西;ARGU來說，因爲題目比較長，所以讀題的時間就要比前者長。
第一遍建議先把每一個意羣講的是什麼簡要提出來，排上序號;第二從這些小短句分析其文章結構和主要錯誤;第三把自己對錯誤的闡述順序列出來。這樣差不多是可以的了。
四：掌握一些制定GRE作文提綱的小技巧
需要在練習中找到自己的記錄法，哪種縮寫是自己看得明瞭的。要記出來的摘要最後自己還要辨析幾分鐘。建議在平時列提綱的時候就有意識的做一下限定時間練習，看2-3分鐘能不能把大體的框架列出來。掌握了這些你就能輕輕鬆鬆拿到一個讓你滿意地GRE分數。
GRE作文範文：過度專業化問題
GRE寫作題目：
“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”
近些年來，學科已經細化到了相當的程度以至於學者們的理念隻影響小範圍的人羣。除非學者們能擁有影響等大範圍的人羣，否則他們的理念將幾乎毫無用處。
GRE作文範文：
Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.
The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.
During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means a
new discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!
From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.
With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.
GRE寫作滿分範文
"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."
The quotation is certainly correct, insofar as it describes at least an element of wisdom. In other words, I do agree with the proposition, subject to the proviso that the achievement of wisdom may well also involve other traits or attributes.
Having qualified my answer somewhat, I must endorse the principles put forth in the quotation. Overlooking -- or, perhaps, forgetting -- is a crucial skill one needs to master in order to navigate the often-treacherous paths of life without undue torment. From my own experience, and from observations of friends, family members and business associates, I am well aware of the pitfalls which await those who fail to overlook the petty, the unnecessary and the irrelevant.
In modern America, as it happens, the importance of overlooking is probably greater than ever before. Even a person trying to lead a quiet, simple life encounters an endless stream of annoyances, errors and petty demands such as paperwork, filing numbers and taxes; long lines at the bank; exponentially aggravating traffic jams and sullen, uncooperative coworkers and neighbors. Those of us who cannot overlook such annoyances will invariably succumb to self-defeating dismay.
The ability to overlook also reflects a healthy sense of proportion and priorities. The wise "overlooker" will ignore his or her spouse's failings after making a considered judgment that these are outweighed, in the long run, by greater and more significant strengths. for example, what wise or reasonable person would destroy a marriage solely because an otherwise faithful, kind, generous, intelligent and prosperous partner occasionally tosses socks on the floor?
An elderly aunt of mine makes a striking example. Long widowed, she now spends her days sitting in her apartment, carping endlessly about the many relatives who have slighted her. Nobody calls enough. Nobody pays her any atention. Nobody cares, she says.
And, indeed, why should they? Who wants to visit with someone, elderly or otherwise, who does nothing but complain, find fault and scour for slights? Were she wiser, perhaps she would ignore or even suppress her interminable grievances and take more interest in the world at large, including the very individuals whose attention she purportedly craves.
The paradigm of overlooking applies with equal force in the worlds of business and politics. Look at Richard Nixon: a brilliant, often original thinker, he was nonetheless continually obsessed with minutiae and the unimportant. On some level, I'm sure, he himself realized the dramatic impact of such a glaring character flaw; when the situation was long past salvaging, he exhorted his staff and friends to "Never be petty," a dictum he honored far more in the breach than in the observance.
More prosaically, in business and everyday life, it is indeed the wise person who overlooks or ignores a vast amount. Why come home every day nurturing a grudge? Why spend time grappling with activities, people or attitudes which bring nothing but pain and torment? Still, most of us do, at least somewhat, and find ourselves far diminished for it.
In sum, I think it's safe to say that much in this world merits not even a cursory examination, and those among us are wiser and happier who can successfully budget their time and energy in order to avoid negativity.
Comments:
This is a thoughtful, well-articulated analysis of the issue.
The response opens with a clear endorsement of the stated claim, along with an acknowledgement that wisdom involves additional traits. The writer then begins building an argument that modern life is so full of "petty annoyances" that it would be "self-defeating" to pay much attention to them. Using, first, examples that illustrate the trivial demands encountered everyday (e.g., paperwork, traffic jams), the analysis moves on to personal types of experiences (a partner annoying habits; an aunt self-pity) and then to politics, where, the writer implies, Nixon met his political demise at least partly because of his obsession with "minutiae and the unimportant." The examples clearly support the writer position and lead effectively to the concluding observation about learning to "budget" our time and energy to avoid the negative aspects of life.
In several places, the skillful use of questions helps move the analysis along. And throughout, the skillful use of sentence variety and precise vocabulary combine to convey meaning effectively, as in this excerpt: "when the situation was long past salvaging, he [Nixon] exhorted his staff and friends to a dictum he honored far more in the breach than in the observance." This kind of insightful, articulate analysis merits a score of 6.
