揭祕：雅思寫作拿到7分以上的5大技巧
對於不少考生來說，雅思寫作寫來寫去始終無法突破6分，達到7分以上。而突破這一瓶頸拿到高分，其實也並不複雜。下面小編就給大家分享一下技巧。
揭祕：雅思寫作拿到7分以上的5大技巧
瓶頸形成的原因
明確原因對症下藥纔是解決之道，烤鴨們寫作無法突破瓶頸，往往是因爲以下2大認知誤區作祟：
1、迷戀模板
部分考生很喜歡使用《十天雅思寫作》這類東西，當然這種資料也確實有其功效，對於基礎特別薄弱，分數要求是6分則請大膽使用。但如果想上6分或7分甚至更高，就不要用那麼多的模板，或者挑與自己水平相適應的，不要挑些看起來很高級的，不然不但可能無用甚至產生反作用。
原因很簡單，因爲使用了不匹配的模板會讓雅思考官明確感知到文本語言層次的巨大差異，試想一下如果一篇作文中，每段的開頭結尾轉折的地方都用些華麗麗的辭藻、文言文、詩句之類的，其他部分卻是用最普通易懂的語言，這巨大的反差感，就像你去勾搭了一個大胸妹子，待嘿嘿時候，卻是…
2、追求所謂的高級
有些人認爲寫作要拿高分，一定要用上很多高級詞彙，以顯示自己的高水準，其實不然。大家可以看看劍橋書後面的考官寫的範文，其中並沒有所謂的高級詞彙，都是一些通俗易懂的，大家都認識的單詞。但是爲什麼那種文章就是好呢?因爲那些文章寫的很通順，觀點闡述清晰明白，也就是所謂的”文通字順“。做不到”文通字順“卻追求的都是複雜高級的句式和辭藻，好比爬梯上高樓，但梯子不堪你的重量而碎了，然後就…
突破瓶頸的5大技巧
就像提高中文寫作的方法一樣，提高英文寫作最有效的方法依舊是分析高分範文。分析高分範文是如何進行開頭和過度的。通過閱讀範文，總結出自己的開頭段與中間連接的各種詞組、句子結構等等。其實也像是一種模板化，但是不是寫書的專家給出的那種簡單的模板。
當然考試還是需要一些特別實用的技巧的，以下5點技巧與各位烤鴨分享：
Tip1：不要用你自己都不熟悉的單詞，不要製造機會讓考官扣你分。
Tip2：小作文多用些模板，以減少時間;大作文請儘量少用模板，如果要用，請用些沒那麼多人用的模板。
Tip3：外國人喜歡有案例來支持你的論點，所以請多寫一些有關你論點的新聞報道或研究數據來作爲例子。
Tip4：詞彙咱們不求多華麗，只要句子結構和連接詞用的出彩些，高分也不是問題。
比如：很多人用for example，for instance來舉例，其實你可以用according to the lastest research,或like Prof._x said in University of NewYork：__x… 這些都是很普通卻很有說服力的連接詞。而書上模板往往讓你背的是：for example，on the other hand等等。
通過一些技法可以讓文章呈現出特別的氣勢，比如
普通的寫法：
Even if machine translation were able to eradicate all the language barriers between peoples, learning foreign languages still make sense.
加工後的句型：
Even if machine translation were able to eradicate all the language barriers between people, would there be no point in learning foreign languages? By no means.
Tip5：寫作是練出來的，所以考前3天請一定要寫幾篇練練。實在無法用筆寫下的時候，就在腦子裏過一遍自己熟悉自己的句型，形成一些小文。
雅思大作文範文：富國人民爲什麼不快樂
People in developing countries are happier than before while people in developed countries are no happier than they used to be. Why? What lesson can you learn from it?
話題好像是問爲什麼在已開發的富國人民不如以前快樂，而相對的，在開發中的人民卻是比以前快樂?又問從這種情形學得什麼教訓?
Financially speaking, people are supposed to be happier when their incomes exceed expenses, but the reverse seems to be happening to many people in some developed countries. In comparison, people in some developing countries with a much lower measure of per capita income appear to be happier in what they are actually able to buy within their earnings. The message seems clear enough: higher living standards do not necessarily add to happiness but excessive spending can certainly undermine it.
It is hard to tell what does bring happiness when wealth may ironically fail as much as poverty. In countries full of comforts and luxuries, there are chances that people are beginning to count their troubles in the presence of rising living costs. This is very unlike people in developing countries who make positive sense of life by counting blessings and joys. Even in rich countries, life may become more stressful and less enjoyable under the pressure of increasingly higher living standards from time to time. What is worse, job security is already a major concern particularly among less skilled employees who are nervous about impending layoffs. Besides, the reality of financial crisis is spreading from one developed country to another, further complicating the difficult situation and fueling the anger of many less happy people.
People in most developing countries have reasons to feel happier than before, probably because they live their lives forward. Being relatively poor, they are happier in knowing who they really are, then doing what they need to do in order to have what they want. To them happiness is more like a direction for motivation than a place for leisure. Also, they are more capable of recognizing and appreciating what they do have. In short, they feel happier exactly because they do not expect too much happiness. This mentality is different from people in developing countries who have large incomes but also large expenses, often resulting in negative balance sheets.
In sum, the only way to avoid being unhappy in life, whether referring to a developed country or a developing country, is to have happy thoughts about living within their means and having something to hope for. Per capita income can no longer be the only measure for economic happiness, judging from the fact that people in developed countries are not as happy as they used to be. Without any doubt, the lesson about being happy is for an individual as well as for a country to perform a balancing act between incomes and expenses.
雅思寫作：職業運動員
寫作題目
Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while other think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
範文
As a result of constant media attention, sports professionals in my country have become stars and celebrities, and those at the top are paid huge salaries. Just like movie stars, they live extravagant lifestyles with huge houses and cars.
Many people find their rewards unfair, especially when comparing these super salaries with those of top surgeons or research scientists, or even leading politicians who have the responsibility of governing the country. However, sports salaries are not determined by considering the contribution to society a person makes, or the level of responsibility he or she holds. Instead, they reflect the public popularity of sport in general and the level of public support that successful stars can generate. So the notion of “fairness” is not the issue.
While those who feel that sports stars’ salaries are justified might argue that the number of professionals with real talent are very few, and the money is a recognition of the skills and dedication a person needs to be successful. Competition is constant and a player is tested every time they perform in their relatively short career. The pressure from the media is intense and there is little privacy out of the spotlight. So all of these factors may justify the huge earnings.
Personally, I think that the amount of money such sports stars make is more justified than the huge earnings of movie stars, but at the same time, it indicates that our society places more value on sport than on more essential professionals and achievements.
雅思寫作範文：傳統治貪婪自私
大家好!我說過，只要有難度的作文，我會站出來幫大家的.現看到那麼多人遭遇"黑色情人"， 在中國有一種四代同堂的tradition人很多，對長者必須絕對地respect or even obey.家有“家規”，管教特多，最長者最有威信，不是憑能力來定地位，而是由年齡來決定。多大程度上同意或不同意這種題應該說是比較靈活的，下面爲其中的一種寫作思路給大家參考： 贊成traditions of family and community對付greed n selfishness有招，因爲四代同堂，老大掌門，互助友愛，共產同樂，無“私”可撈，無利可貪。However，“舊社會”不能給我們帶來更好的生活。我想舉個例來說明。在我山區老家，到如今還有個傳統：婦女不能與男人同桌而食，只能吃leftovers. s e x ual discrimination(性別歧視) 絕對傳統。
In many parts of the world， a traditional concept of family called four generations living together has been handed down for thousands of years. In old times， the eldest man usually dominated others without any challenge amid the overpopulated home. In comparison with modern society， such a place should be an effective habitat to keep greed and selfishness ，which is considered as born nature of humans， away as a consequence of helping each other and sharing property between family members under the supervision of the most influential man. However， over a thousand-year period those female members suffered extremely tough circumstances of s e x ual discrimination: they were in charge of childcare， household chores， farmingtopsoil clearing and planting， you name it. What’s worse， they weren’t allowed to dine with men at the same table-leftovers filled up their bellies. Conversely， in contemporary society， a growing number of females are fighting for more human rights， say， equality to males， and they are gaining ground! How to convince the "fierce female tigers" these traditions are their better destiny? No way!!!A better life can never be expected by only eliminating greed and selfishness. whereas it ought to be defined along with the following qualities: privacy respected， individual development， no s e x ual discrimination and a fair community with equal opportunities. In addition to my viewpoint， an appropriate way of education would probably a sensible solution to minimize the goddamn greed and selfishness in modern society instead of returning to the old society.
