雅思寫作入門題型介紹
雅思寫作備考中，對於基礎比較差的考生來說，先不要直接去練習偏難的題目，可以先做一些基礎練習，熟悉基礎考試題型。今天小編爲大家帶來的是雅思寫作入門題型，希望能幫助到各位考生熟練掌握雅思寫作考試題型的解題方法。
雅思寫作入門題型介紹
1. 給出一種觀點——Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays computer are widely used in education. As a result, some people think teachers no longer play important roles in classrooms.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
2. 給出兩種對立的觀點——Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
Some people argue that there are no basic differences between the way men and women approach academic study. Others insist that there are big differences in areas such as organization, attitude and ambition.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
3. 分析優缺點——Do you think the advantages/ benefits outweigh its disadvantages/ problems?
Some people agree to adopt a new language (Such as English) that can be used by people all of the world for international communication.
Do you think the benefits of this would outweigh the problems?
Report:
給出一種現象 1. Why? 2. Result? 3. Solution?
1/2或1/3
(1/2) Nowadays, people always throw the old things away when they buy new things; whereas in the past, old things were repaired and used again. What factors cause this phenomenon? What effects the phenomenon leads to?
(1/3) Many species of plants and animals are dying out. What are the causes of this trend? How can we prevent it?
雅思範文：城鄉醫療教育的選擇
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. But some others think everyone should be free to choose where they work uss and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, it can be generally observed that the disparity between cities and the country has been aggravated by relentless urbanization. With respect to educational and medical facilities, a yawning gap has emerged between those in cities and the rural ones. This manifest chasm has prompted some to suggest that teachers and doctors fresh out of university work in the country for a few many are opposed to this view on the grounds that it infringes upon individual freedom to choose where they onally, I think both these two views have merit and demerit.
Granted,assigning new teachers and doctors to the countryside may create certain begin with,this practice can help foster a strong sense of obligation in many teachers and can experience first-hand how the rural residents are held back by the out-moded teaching and medical facilities and this, in turn, can inspire a host of professionals to commit themselves to the alleviation of this disturbing situation. Moreover,the inferior living and working conditions in the country can temper many of these young professionals’ are very likely to be more tenacious and determined and hence more successful than their urban counterparts in later careers.
However,there are even more drawbacks that this practice can the first place,many young teachers and doctors will feel unmotivated or frustrated if they are sent to rural areas against their own may have a hard time getting accustomed to the shabby housing and primitive facilities and slack off at the second place,if new teachers and doctors are coerced to work in the countryside, a considerable proportion of them may find it daunting when it comes time for them to relocate to cities after a few years in the will feel intense occupational stress when they cannot operate efficiently equipment much more advanced than the devices they are used to back in the country school or hospital. Last but not least, given the inferiority of the rural educational and medical facilities,it is highly probable that the inexperience of new teachers and doctors will lead to unsatisfactory job performance in rural schools and really cannot expect fresh recruits to work wonders with outdated tools.
In the final analysis,I concede that sending teachers and doctors fresh out of college to the countryside may produce specific advantages. However,if we enforce this indiscriminately,that will surely generate even more banes. On balance, I am convinced we should optimize our workforce and honor the individual freedom in determining where they work.
雅思寫作：女生參軍
Some countries allow women to join the army. Some other people think army doesn’t suit women. Do you agree or disagree? Please state your reasons.
Agree: Firstly, modern wars are not as cruel as before. Women will not face any danger because the decisive factor of modern wars is technology, not physique. Most females have received higher education and mastered advanced knowledge. They can serve in the army like men. Secondly, some occupations in the army are more suitable to females. For instance, most medical workers in the field hospitals are females because they are more patient and careful. They can give tender care to the wounded soldiers. Finally, females have played very important roles in wars in history. Females are good at coping with the unexpected events because they enjoy advantages over males psychologically.
Sample writing:
It is a strongly held belief that kitchen and laundry are for women and wars are for men. Even though women are allowed to join the army in some countries, most of them are far away from the frontier. However, as the application of high technology in the army accelerates, women’s participation in the army becomes not unusual.
First and foremost, modern wars tend to be non-contagious with the filtration of science and technology. Thus, the dangers facing women will be reduced considerably. The development of new technology offers numerous opportunities to females because the decisive factor of modern wars is technology, not physique. Most women, just like their counterpart, have received higher education and mastered high technology. They have neither physical barrier nor technical obstacle to serve in the army.
What’s more, some jobs can be better done by females rather than men in the army. For instance, many doctors and nurses in the field hospitals are females. Injury and death are inevitable in the battlefield. In that case, females usually shoulder the responsibility to render medical service to the wounded since they are more patient and careful than males. The wounded soldiers can receive good medical care and recover soon.
Last but not least, women played very important role in wars in history. Women enjoy much more advantages over males. For instance, females are calm when they meet with urgency. Their contributions in the wartime are notable.
In brief, the role women soldiers play in the war cannot be underestimated. Women should be encouraged to join the army in modern time. For one thing, it is beneficial to the army; for another, females can become more brave and respectable. (280 words)
雅思大作文範文：年輕人崇拜明星
寫作題目
Nowadays young people are admiring media and sports stars, even though they do not set a good example. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
題目寫作思路分析
大綱：邏輯心圖，四段定位，18句裝配。
起--好現象，因爲對年輕人來說，既是心態正常又是反應社會發展，與道德考慮無關。
承--理由例子細節。年輕人崇拜明星是極其正常的心裏歷程，無關道德榜樣。
轉--理由例子細節。年輕人崇拜明星是反應媒體社會的影響，無關道德榜樣。
合--整體而言是好現象，到底青年人免不了崇拜明星，所以道德的聯想應該擺在一邊。
範文
There is no need to be overly preoccupied with the fantasy images of stars standing out from the rest on the screen, the stage and the playing field because celebrity worship is part of everyday life, particularly among adolescents. That young people are admiring media and sports celebrities is socially normal outside the academic and behavioral context. Accepting that it is good and natural to be young, then it is inevitable for young people to be obsessed with certain personalities as their ideal examples.
Psychologically speaking, a certain amount of star admiration is normal. When young, becoming fans of favorite stars is a form of escapism and a way to dull emotional pain and stress; so, emulating celebrities is a natural part of development to identify themselves with their icons. Even in adulthood, people rank successful individuals highly and model themselves after them. In a global media culture, the lifestyle promoted by stars is often unattainable to the average person, regardless of whether it is realistic or ideal. Hence, the point is that young people choose their models for reasons based on renowned excellence in a specific field rather than on scandals that happen sometimes. That is, it is to admire what is shining in famous people's career successes and not what happen to shadow their real lives.
Not unlike fashion, "star worship syndrome" is simply a social development, although there could be an unhealthy interest in the private lives of actors, actresses, pop singers, and sports players. Admiring celebrities may be as blind as falling in love, and just as normal. When it comes to immature and confused minds, love cannot be avoided, nor can admiration for heroes and heroines. Such star obsession has proliferated since the creation of the mass media and therefore it had better not be regarded as a moral issue. To believe that celebrity worship is a negative development only makes out-of-date moral sense, leading to nowhere. In this gossip world, to criticize celebrities for failing to deliver good examples all the time beyond their specialized fields calls for the need to stop, in the first place, the media outlets from reporting what gossip is made of.
Admiration for favorite stars does no harm to people, young or old; besides, star admiration cannot be avoided in this information age. Fortunately, most fans are able to learn to tell a realistic world from an ideal world during this period between no-longer children and not-yet adults, without having to refer to moral examples. Indeed, there is nothing wrong about young people seeking their idols by looking up at the shining stars in the fantasy world to which many young people naturally belong.
