新gre作文時間要求安排詳情
自從gre考試改革後，很多同學們對於新gre考試做題還把握不了規律，尤其是新gre作文時間把握，由於同學們還不能完全適應考試題型可能花費的時間較多，下面小編就爲大家詳細介紹一下新gre作文時間要求!
新gre作文時間要求安排詳情
【考試流程】
1.考試在10點開始，要求考生最晚在9:30進入考場。
Secret1: 和TOEFL一樣，你10點到，10點之後考試仍然沒有問題，每個人開考時間不同，中途休息時間不同，結束時間也不同。
2.到考生等候室覈對身份證領取鑰匙在小櫃子裏存包，填寫考生保密協議,簽名。
Secret2：儘量快速完成抄寫保密誓詞，，不能帶水入場，上好廁所。
3.檢查證件，用機場和地鐵的掃描設備掃你，看你有沒有攜帶作弊工具，之後坐在椅子上拍半身照，電腦攝像頭，之後電腦隨機安排考位。
Secret3: 不鼓勵，但如果你心理素質好，可以攜帶非紙質類的作弊工具4:每個考生桌子上放着三張草稿紙，有三種顏色：慘紅，慘綠或者是慘黃，和一直兩頭都削好了的鉛筆。
Secret4: 草稿紙不夠可以無限續杯，但要一張就要還回去一張，手中一直保持3張。
5.正式考試界面登錄之後就是模考軟件PP2上的界面一模一樣了。 。先是兩個作文的部分，一個Issue一個Argue，各30分鐘，寫夠字數基本上就是滿屏左右。因爲每行屏幕能寫12個單詞左右。每個Section結束後可休息1分鐘。兩個作文部分結束後，進入到語文或者數學部分。
Secret5: 一開始的頁面是詢問你考試數則信息是否正確，然後問你的專業，完全可以skip跳過，這段沒有任何意義。
Secret6: 考場中沒有攝像頭，尤其沒有直接對着你的攝像頭，老師也不會盯着你看，所以如果你帶紙質的模板參考的話，被抓到的可能性不大，但你要自己慎重考慮。
6.正常的考生會遇到V-Q-V-Q-或者是Q-V-Q-V，一定會有一個加試，可能語文可能數學每個考生不一樣,在兩篇作文和兩個Section之後會有十分鐘休息。。
Secret7: 休息不止10分鐘，如果沒有老師來你座位上輸入授權碼，考試到時間也是不會自動開始的，可以出去吃東西喝水etc...
GRE寫作滿分範文1
Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.??
The?arguement?is?well?presented?and?supported,?but?not?completely?well?reasoned.??It?is?clear?and?concisely?written.??The?content?is?logically?and?smoothly?presented.??Statistics?cited?are?used?to?develop?support?for?the?recommendation,?that?roller?skaters?who?invest?in?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment?can?reduce?their?risk?of?severe,?accidental?injuries.??Examples?of?the?types?of?protective?equipment?are?described?for?the?reader.??Unfortunately,?the?author?of?the?argement?fails?to?note?that?merely?by?purchasing?gear?and?reflective?equipment?that?the?skater?will?be?protected.??This?is,?of?course,?falacious?if?the?skater?fails?to?use?the?equipment,?or?uses?it?incorrectly?or?inappropriately.??It?is?also?an?unnecessary?assumption?that?a?skater?need?purchase?high-quality?gear?for?the?same?degree?of effectiveness?to?be?achieved.??The?argument?could?be?improved?by?taking?these?issues?into?consideration,?and?making?recommendations?for?education?and?safety?awareness?to?skaters.??
Commentary??
The?first?half?of?this?generally?well-written?but?limited?response?merely?describes?the?argument.??The?second?half?of?the?paper?identifies?two?assumptions?of?the?argument:??
--?that?people?who?purchase?protective?gear?will?use?the?gear?--?that?high-quality?gear?is?more?effective?than?other?gear??
These?points?are?sufficient?to?constitute?some?analysis?and?thus?warrant?a?score?of?3.??However,?neither?of?these?analytic?points?is?developed?sufficiently?to?merit?a?score?of?4.
GRE寫作滿分範文2
Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.??
To?reduce?the?accidents?from?roller?skating?we?should?consider?about?it?causes?and?effects?concurrently?to?find?the?best?solution.??Basically?the?roller-skating?players?are?children,?they?had?less?experiences?to?protect?themselves?from?any?kind?of?dangerous.??Therefore,?it?should?be?a?responsible?of?Adult?to?take?care?them.??Adult?should?recommend?their?child?to?wear?any?protective?clothing,?set?the?rules?and?look?after?them?while?they?are?playing.??
In?the?past?roller-skating?is?limited?in?the?skate?yard?but?when?it?became?popular?people?normally?play?it?on?the?street?way)?Therefore?the?number?of?accidents?from?roller-skating?is?increased.??The?skate?manufacturer?should?have?a?responsibility?in?producing?a?protective?clothing.??They?should?promote?and?sell?them?together?with?skates.??The?government?or?state?should?set?the?regulation?of?playing?skate?on?the?street?way?like?they?did?with?the?bicycle.??
To?prevent?this?kind?of?accident?is?the?best?solution?but?it?needs?a?coorperation?among?us?to?have?a?concious?mind?to?beware?and?realize?its?dangerous.??
Commentary??
This?seriously?flawed?response,?rather?than?critiquing?the?argument,?suggests?ways?for?adults?and?skate?manufacturers?to?ensure?that?children?wear?protective?clothing.??In?essence,?the?writer?is?uncritically?accepting?the?argument.??
The?response?exhibits?serious?and?frequent?problems?in?sentence?structure?and?language?use.??Errors?--?word?choice,?verb?tenses,?subject-verb?agreement,?punctuation?--?are?numerous?and?sometimes?interfere?with?meaning,?e.g.,?".?needs?a?cooperation?among?us?to?have?a?concious?mind?to?beware?and?realize its?dangerous."??
This?essay?earns?a?2?because?it?demonstrates?both?serious?linguistic?weaknesses?and?failure?to?construct?a?critique?based?on?logical?analysis.
GRE寫作滿分範文3
Hospital?statistics?regarding?people?who?go?to?the?emergency?room?after?roller-skating?accidents?indicate?the?need?for?more?protective?equipment.??Within?this?group?of?people,?75?percent?of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protective?clothing?(helmets,?knee?pads,?etc.)?or?any?light-reflecting?material?(clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads,?etc.).??Clearly,?these?statistics?indicate?that?by?investing?in?high-quality?protective?gear?and?reflective?equipment,?roller?skaters?will?greatly?reduce?their?risk?of?being?severely?injured?in?an?accident.??
the?protective?equipment?do?help?to?reduce?the?risk?of?being?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident?since?there?are?75%?Of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protectivel?clothing.?such?as?hemlets,?kenn?pads,?etc.?or?any?light-reflecting?materials?such?as?clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads?ets.?if?they?do?have?protective?eqipment?that?only?a?quarter?accident?may?happen,?also?that?can?greatly?reduce?their?risk?ofbeing?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident,?that?can?save?some?lives?and?a?lot?of?energy?and?money?for?the?treatment.??the?protective?equipment?do?help?to?reduce?the?risk?of?being?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident?since?there?are?75%?Of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protectivel?clothing.?such?as?hemlets,?kenn?pads,?etc.?or?any?light-reflecting?materials?such?as?clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads?ets.?if?they?do?have?protective?eqipment?that?only?a?quarter?accident?may?happen,?also?that?can?greatly?reduce?their?risk?ofbeing?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident,?that?can?save?some?lives?and?a?lot?of?energy?and?money?for?the?treatment.??the?protective?equipment?do?help?to?reduce?the?risk?of?being?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident?since?there?are?75%?Of?those?who?had?accidents?in?streets?or?parking?lots?were?not?wearing?any?protectivel?clothing.?such?as?hemlets,?kenn?pads,?etc.?or?any?light-reflecting?materials?such?as?clip-on?lights,?glow-in-the-dark?wrist?pads?ets.?if?they?do?have?protective?eqipment?that?only?a?quarter?accident?may?happen,?also?that?can?greatly?reduce?their?risk?ofbeing?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident,?that?can?save?some?lives?and?a?lot?of?energy?and?money?for?the?treatment.??
Commentary??
This?fundamentally?deficient?response?uncritically?accepts?the?reasoning?of?the?topic:?"the?protective?equipment?do?help?to?reduce?the?risk?of?being?severyly?injuryed?in?an?accident."??There?is?no?evidence,?though,?that?the?writer?is?able?to?understand?or?analyze?the?argument;?what?follows,?except?for?a?few?additional?words,?merely?copies?the?topic.??This?two-sentence?response?is?repeated?--?verbatim?--?two?more?times.??
Language?and?usage?are?equally?problematic.??The?few?words?that?have?been?added,?in?combination?with?the?words?of?the?topic,?results?in?incoherence.??In?sum,?this?essay?fits?all?of?the?scoring?guide?descriptors?for?a?1.
