當前位置

首頁 > 英語閱讀 > 雙語新聞 > “匿名者”疏遠維基解密,祕密情報何去何從

“匿名者”疏遠維基解密,祕密情報何去何從

推薦人: 來源: 閱讀: 1.45W 次

ing-bottom: 60%;">“匿名者”疏遠維基解密,祕密情報何去何從

The computer hacker collective Anonymous has distanced itself from WikiLeaks, claiming the whistleblowers' site has become too focused on the personal tribulations of its founder, Julian Assange.

電腦黑客組織匿名已經疏遠了維基解密,並聲稱該解密網站已經太專注於其創始人朱利安•阿桑奇的個人磨難。

A statement posted on the Anonymous Twitter account, Anonymous IRC, described Wiki Leaks as "the one man Julian Assange show" after the website began asking users to pay for access to millions of leaked documents.

一份聲明發布在匿名者的Twitter帳戶,即匿名者IRC,在網站開始要求用戶支付數以百萬計泄密文件的訪問費用之後,把維基解密描述爲“朱利安•阿桑奇一個人的表演”。

"The idea behind Wiki Leaks was to provide the public with information that would otherwise be kept secret by industries and governments. Information we strongly believe the public has a right to know," said the statement on behalf of Anonymous.

“維基解密背後的理念是向公衆提供被行業和政府保密的信息。我們強烈認爲公衆有權知道這些信息。”匿名者在聲明說。

"But this has been pushed more and more into the background, instead we only hear about Julian Assange, like he had dinner last night with Lady Gaga. That's great for him but not much of our interest. We are more interested in transparent governments and bringing out documents and information they want to hide from the public."

“但是這已經越來越被推向了背地,相反我們只聽到關於朱利安•阿桑奇的信息,比如昨晚他與Lady Gaga共進晚餐。這對他而言很棒,但不是基於我們的利益。我們對透明的政府以及他們想隱瞞公衆的文件和信息更有興趣。”

Anonymous has long been one of WikiLeaks's most loyal and vocal allies.

匿名者是維基解密長期以來最忠實最暢所欲言的盟友之一。

WikiLeaks said it is funded entirely by donations from members of the public. The site angered some users on Thursday after it made a donation page automatically appear before it allowed access to leaked documents. Some users are unable to view WikiLeaks material unless they choose to donate money to the site. WikiLeaks said on Twitter that the move was an attempt to counter what it called "high costs in military courts".

維基解密說它的經費完全來自公衆捐款。在允許訪問泄密文件之前它製作了一個自動捐贈頁面,週四該網站激怒了一些用戶。有些用戶無法查看維基解密的材料,除非他們選擇捐錢給該網站。維基解密在Twitter上說此舉是試圖對抗它所謂的“高成本軍事法院”。

In the statement, Anonymous told its 285,000 followers that WikiLeaks was an "awesome idea ruined by egos" and claimed the site had abandoned the ideals of freedom of expression.

在聲明中,匿名告訴他285,000名追隨者,維基解密是一個“被自我摧毀的極棒的點子”,並聲稱該網站已經放棄了言論自由的理念。

The group added: "We have been worried about the direction WikiLeaks is going for a while. In the recent month the focus moved away from actual leaks and the fight for freedom of information further and further while it concentrated more and more on Julian Assange. It goes without saying that we oppose any plans of extraditing Julian to the USA. He is a content provider and publisher, not a criminal."

該組織補充說:“我們一直在擔心維基解密一時將走向何方。最近一個月重心從實際解密和進一步爭取信息自由中轉移,越來越多地集中到朱利安•阿桑奇身上。不用說,我們反對任何引渡朱利安回美國的計劃。他是一個內容提供者和發行商,而不是一個罪犯。”

The dispute could starve WikiLeaks of potentially newsworthy leaks in the future, as some of the site's recent disclosures – including the cache of Strat for emails – are alleged to have come from Anonymous.

這次爭議可能會消解維基解密未來潛在的新聞價值,正如網站最近披露的一些東西,包括國際情報公司Stratfor存儲器上的郵件,據稱是來自匿名者。