託福複習：1個月如何複習託福寫作?
1個月的託福複習計劃是建立在大家已經打好基礎的前提下，並非從零開始，這一點大家要注意。下面從綜合寫作和獨立寫作兩個版塊分別給大家提供一些複習計劃，供大家參考學習。
託福複習：1個月如何複習託福寫作?
一.1個月如何複習託福獨立寫作
正常來說，寫作備考應該有一個初期詞彙和素材積累的過程，但是我們現在來說只有一個月複習時間的話，我們直接從範文開始看，不再單獨去積累詞彙和素材。很多學生也知道通過看範文來充實自己的寫作食糧，然而往往看與不看貌似沒神馬差別。首先，閱讀高分及滿分範文，不是去賞析一篇散文，閱讀過程中需要我們去分析範文中的詞彙、句式以及一些素材，然後把這些內容都做一個積累本。一篇範文看完後，學習到哪些內容應該自己再去總結一下，最後在自己寫作的時候儘量的去套用。範文建議分類別看，比如我們集中看5篇教育類範文，就可以積累相對應的教育類作文常用的素材和詞彙，那麼自己寫教育類作文的時候就可以把積累下來的詞和素材得以運用。
二.1個月如何複習託福綜合寫作
一個複習託福綜合寫作的話，綜合寫作部分的練習建議在模考軟件中按照考試流程來進行，在規定的時間內讀閱讀、聽聽力、然後計時寫作，寫的過程中注意以下幾點：1. 單詞的拼寫，邊打字邊檢查;2. 三單的問題，也就是每句話的謂語要重點關注語態和時態;3. 不能出現與閱讀內容連續超過6words的重複，也就是說寫作中需要用到閱讀內容時必須要自己改寫;4. 注意聽力內容的轉述，不要盲目概括，要清楚聽力內容的邏輯;5. 不要去套用網絡上盛行的各種模板，自己的創新更重要。
託福寫作範文:政府保護自然環境應採取什麼措施
此題爲三選一
What is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of environmental problems? Fund researches on new energy sources such as solar and wind power? Protect forests and natural wildlife species? Pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution.
三選一類題目會給出三個選項A, B, C讓學生去選擇一個。這種題的答題方法爲開頭段-正文段第一段B好-正文段第二段B的另一個優點-正文段第三段B比A好/A的缺點和B比C好/C的缺點-結尾段。
託福獨立寫作真題回顧
What one of the following is the most important action for the government to take for the protection of natural environment?
(1)fund research on new energy sources such as solar and wind power;
(2)preserve natural places such as forests and natural wildlife species.
(3)pass and enforce laws to reduce the pollution produced by companies and industries
點睛：
題目大意：對政府來說，要想保護自然環境，政府最應該採取哪項措施：資助研究新能源，保護棲息地和動物，制定法規來減少公司的污染排放。 此題目爲三選一的題目，波波提醒各位小夥伴，對於這樣的題目，我們有兩點要做到：1.必須要清楚選出一個選項，2.三個選項在整篇文章論述中務必都要提到。只要能做到上述兩點即可，所以三選一題目的寫作結構非常靈活，下面是波波選擇的一種寫法，僅供參考。
託福寫作模板及參考答案：
託福寫作範文參考一:
2016年6月25日託福獨立寫作範文：
Taking a panoromic view of human history, we can readily find that the natural environment plays an enormously important role in determing the future of each and every country. Given the great significance of clean environment, the general public as well as the governors begin to wonder which is the most essential action to protect the environment, among funding new energy research, preserving natural habitat or enacting strict laws. Towards such a long-running tug-of-war, I am inclined to argue that national governments should invest financial support in developing new energy sources.
Initially, spending more money in discovering new energy can radically solve the various environmental problems. As is common sense, the deteriorating environment is the result of the overexploitation of fossil fuels, including coal, oil and natural gas. To be specific, numerous chemical plants usually burn the coal to provide power for manufacturing all kinds of goods designed to satisfy the basic needs of the general public. As a result, a large amounts of industrial wastes are discharged to take a toll on the natural environment. Also, an increasing number of petrol-powered automobiles will definitely emit car exhause(e.g. fumes and toxic gas), which can increase the likelihood of the public suffering from respiratory diseases. All the above problems related to environment can be resolved by find new and clean energy like solar energy, wind power and tidal power. Undoubtedly, replacing the traditional energy with the new ones can dramatically decrease the pollution and contamination, thus leading to a better living environment. For example, once the cars uses the electricity instead of petrol, the air quality will improve to a large extent.
Secondly, there are conspicuous limitation of the other two options. As for preserving natural places, the effect of this practice is relatively restricted. To illustrate, the traditional energy sources are usually exploited and discovered in the natural places. Consequently, the preservation of natural places will hinder the access to various energy and thus impede the progress of the whole society. Also, the same logic applies to passing laws to reduce pollution. It is an indisputable fact that across the globe, many countries now are heaviely dependent on the industries and factories which produce pollutions. In other words, once the law of punishing these companies is enforced, these corporation may have to cut down their output and make less profits, even ending up going bankcrupt. Accordingly, the national economy and the living standard of the public will suffer too.
Factoring what has been discussed above, we can conclude that funding research of environmental friendly energy will be more preferable, because finding proper alternative energy is the key to solving the environmental problems comprehensively.
託福寫作寫作參考二:
託福獨立寫作範文：
The statement above attempts to assert whether funding on environmental friendly resources, preserving wildlife species, or enforcing laws to be the most crucial way to protect the environment has long been centered in dispute. Too often people hold the idea inventing new energy resources and passing laws could be effective ways to eradicate environmental related issues. However, as far as I am concerned protecting plants and animals would be a much more direct and sufficient solution.
To the extent that species extinction is the result of anthropogenic events such as direct or indirect human activities and further threaten the delicate balance which all animal including human beings depend upon. Thus protecting the forests and natural wildlife species has the priority to be dealt with. For example, the extinction of the dodo, a flightless bird endemic to the Indian Ocean island of Mauritius, was directly attributable to human activity. As the nature is an intricate matrix of interdependent relationships, in which each species depends on many others for its survival, the dying out of Dodo caused a certain native tree whose seeds dispersed by Dodo, extinct either. Nowadays, many species face the similar circumstance either and it greatly results in human being’s greedy. To make mechanic profit, the underground dealers trade the skin of the Siberian Tiger, and horn of the Tibetan Antelope and the African Elephant, making those animals hardly ensure the preservation. For protecting the balanced ecosystem, human beings should place a very high affirmative duty to protect wildlife species.
In addition, many species possess great values to human race, some of which are not realized by human yet, requiring people to protect them without any effort. Thermal insulation and conductive resistance enables latex, extracting from the rubber tree, to be the essential component of industrial products for daily uses, such as rubber gloves and rubber sheath. Not only plants play an important role in industrial field, but works for medical perspective as well, especially function as Chinese herbal medicine. For instance, marijuana provides relief from pain and Lianqiao helps with heat removing. If cutting down most of the rubber trees and herbal species, we will leave limited resources for our future generation. For the reason above, it is essential for human beings contribute more on wildlife species protection to handle environmental resources shortage problems.
Admittedly, allocate money on new energy and pass laws to reduce pollution have the merit, however, they are impractical. Take spending on natural energy as an example. On the one threshold, with the technology we have now, the energy sources are not stable and even costly. Wind and solar energy cannot be obtained on a calm and cloudy day. On the other one, they cost the country a lot. I do not deny that wind and solar energy, cleaner energy as they are, would be a wiser choice for developed counties who have money and resources to solve the carbine dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and toxic gases relevant problems and to a great extend release environmental pressure, such as global warming jeopardy. However, when it comes to developing countries, poverty, higher unemployment rate, and high inflation are all problems that developing countries need to worry about. The better solution is to encourage factories to produce more goods and services. To cut down the costs, it is inevitable to produce air and water pollutions. Passing laws and inventing impede the economic growth on a large scale.
In sum, considering the financial and practical analyzing, it is safe to conclude that preserve wildlife species is the most important action to protect the natural environment rather than creating new energy and enforcing laws.
託福寫作範文:搬去新地方會失去老朋友嗎
Agree or disagree:it is often not a good city to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose touch with old friends.
真題重現
It is not a good thing to move to a new cityor country because we will lose old friends.
2016年3月26日託福獨立寫作解析
該題目從題型分類上來講，不屬於常見題型(絕對型、對比型、建議型)，其最顯著的特徵是題目本身帶有一個因果關係：因爲會失去老朋友，所以搬到一個新地方不是一件好的事情。嚴格來講，如果從同意的角度來寫，思路可能會受到題目的限制，即只能想到從失去老朋友這個角度來論證搬去新地方不好。所以這種題目從不同意的角度更容易寫出邏輯嚴謹，內容豐富的文章。下面的範文採取不同意的立場，主體段第一段寫，搬去新地方不見得會失去老朋友，因爲通訊工具日益發達;第二個主體段寫，就算老朋友有些疏遠，也不能因此斷定搬去新地方不好，反而可以開始一段新生活、瞭解新的文化、結交新的朋友。
託福寫作模板及參考答案：
託福寫作範文參考一:
2016年3月26日託福獨立寫作範文 (新東方 周徐敏)
As the technology of public transportation keeps advancing, more citizens can choose to dwell in the cities that are beneficial to their own development. Inevitably, there occurs a controversy whether moving to a new city or country will lead to the rupture of relationship among friends. From my perspective, I think the statement is not sensible.
Firstly, moving to a new country or city will not result in the loss of old friends. To be more specific, the maintenance of friendship doesn’t lie in how far they live with each other and the development of technology has diversified the ways of interacting with friends. The invention of cellphones break the shackles caused by distance and overseas students can choose to communicate with their family members and friends through a variety of Apps like WeChat that makes video calls possible. Except for that, by looking at the pictures popping up all over the social media like Facebook, people can easily capture what is happening to their friends. For instance, my friend Selina took selfie in the Sydney Opera House a week ago and I would learn that she was having fun in the Australia with her picture posted on the Instagram. Therefore, a wide range of advanced electronic gadgets can be used to sustain friendship.
Moreover, instead of losing old friends, city migrants can even enlarge their social circles and achieve more success. Restricted in a city for a long period, people may be trapped in a situation that would block their development and they can gain refreshing experience while immigrating to a new city. My friend of Mine named Michael served as a Market Analyst in a renewed company in Beijing. However, he couldn’t see any progress in recent years and then an opportunity comes out. Because of his five-year working experience, a foreign trade cooperation tried to recruit him as the Market Analyst because the firm was planning to start a new program. Then he grasped the chance and earn a challenging life that he likes even though he was required to work in Shanghai. Our relationship have not experienced any interruption and his strong ability of being adapted to the new environment helps him to make lots of new friends. Accordingly, moving to a new city can, occasionally, help to break the deadlock in our professions.
Admittedly, it can be sensible that friends can be estranged owing to the long distance with each other. Specifically speaking, the chances to meet with each other will be limited a lot. However, as I just put, for one thing, people can talk with each other through various social network software. For another thing, the distance between cities is not a problem anymore since there have been many public transportation tools like the high-speed trains and airplanes that will lead us to anyplace we try to go in a very short period.
In a word, moving to a new city or a new country is good choice under some circumstance. Besides, the highly developed technology can help to strengthen the relations with our friends and the possibilities of living a different life and achieving success can both explain why I stand by the statement that it is a good thing to move to a new city. (546 words )
