比爾蓋茨和喬布斯誰更高大上？

Is Bill Gates underrated when compared to Steve Jobs?
比起史蒂夫·喬布斯，人們是否低估了比爾·蓋茨？
獲得1.5k好評的答案：@Jeff Ronne

Without a doubt.
毫無疑問。

For starters Bill Gates is the richest person on the planet despite the fact he has not worked for decades. This is a testimonyto enormous economic value he created. Microsoft is principally the reason for the commoditization and realization of the computing age.
儘管創始者比爾·蓋茨工作了還不到幾十年，但他卻是世界首富。這是他創造了巨大經濟價值的一個見證。對於實現計算機時代的商品化，微軟起了主要作用。

Gates is the number one humanitarian on the planet. He not only has donated his wealth to the planet but has used his personal integrity and intellect to convince others such as Warren Buffet (the 2nd richest person in the world) to do the same. The fact that others are willing to trust Gates with their vast wealth and life's legacy demonstrates that Gates is uniquely skilled and talented. Gates has social intellect to change the world and the course of history. Gates did the same with Microsoft, he designed and created the mechanism.
蓋茨是世界上的大慈善家。他不僅向世界捐贈了他的財富，還用他的個人誠信和智慧去說服其他人、如沃倫·巴菲特（世界上第二富翁）做相同的事情。事實上，以蓋茨的巨大財富和他的遺產分配來說，人們大多是願意相信他的，同時也證明了蓋茨的獨特技能和才華。蓋茨所擁有的社會智慧已經改變了整個世界歷史的進程。蓋茨同樣選擇了微軟，但他卻選擇設計和創造屬於自己的機制。

Do people forget how Gates bailed out and saved Apple 15 or so years ago ? Gates is not petty or vindictive. He helped a competitor and associate Jobs because he understands the value of building relationships.
難道人們會忘記蓋茨曾經是如何幫助蘋果擺脫困境、並持續支持了它15年左右的嗎？蓋茨並不笨，更不會懷恨在心。他幫助了競爭者喬布斯，並且還跟他合作，因爲他懂得建立人際關係的價值所在。

Gates has grown and transformed his entire being with purpose and intent for decades. Yes the Bill Gates of the early '80s was not a patron saint but he was smart enough to grow and change.
蓋茨已經不是原來的蓋茨了，他改變了接下來數十年裏目標。是的，80年代初期的比爾·蓋茨不是一個守護神，但他卻能夠聰明地成長和改變。

Gates is a very, very smart person. I have taken courses from a few Nobel prize winners and the common observation about brilliant people is that they do not flout their intelligence. It is immaterial to them that they are the smartest in the room. Intelligence is a tool, a means to a greater end, not a grand prize for superiority. Gates in fact would be deserving of the Nobel peace prize.
蓋茨是一個極其聰明的人。我學過關於一些諾貝爾獎得主的課程，普遍研究之後，發現那些偉人都會很好地運用自己的智慧。他們並不在乎自己是所謂最聰明的人，因爲智慧是一種工具，這種工具能使他們獲得更大的成功。蓋茨事實上更應該獲得“諾貝爾和平獎”。

Gates is not interested keeping score. Motivation based solely on competition only goes so far. In the end making a lasting difference in the world is all that matters. Everything else is transient.
蓋茨並不關心別人對他自身的評價。他的動力完全只是來自競爭而已。最重要的是最後能給這個世界帶來持續性的影響，其他都只是暫時的。

Yes Gates is underrated. He does not really care as long it does not interfere with his attempt to change the course of history. Yes as capitalism has created an enormous imbalance of wealth, Gates is designing a permanent mechanism to remedy this structural flaw by willingly redistributing wealth. Nothing like the richest person in the world leading by humble example.
是的，人們低估了蓋茨。只要不干涉他試圖改變歷史進程的目標，他真的可以不在乎。是的，隨着資本主義創造了財富的巨大不平衡，蓋茨正在設計一個永久機制來彌補這一結構性缺陷，並且心甘情願地重新分配財富。簡單來說，世界上沒有哪個富翁能比得上他。